
I think the xc/am trend getting stronger everyday proves that the average user mostly wants a do it all bike. People don't want to buy 8 bikes because most of us can't afford it. So smaller companies, like devinci for instance, covers the entire mountain bike range with 3 bikes (110mm/145mm/216mm). It's not perfect but their accountants probably told them that creating "in-betweens" for niche markets wasn't worth it, much less keeping older models into production.
Now if some big companies like trek/specialized want to make 100mm/120mm/140mm/145mm/150mm/160mm/180mm/200mm bikes with different geos and all the different specs that come with it then so be it. Don't forget that they are more popular and distributed much more broadly so they'll sell more of each bike and in the worst case, they won't mind losing some money on the less popular models as they'll make up for it somewhere else. I'm pretty sure they'd rather keep the visibility and the market shares than supress those bikes from the lineup.
As for keeping older models/designs into production, well, what does it say about your "new tech" if the old tech is still in the line up because it does the job just fine?
Feb 20, 2012 at 14:14